Re: Tables vs. databases
| From: | Lester Caine | Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:58:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Tables vs. databases | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-237729@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Antonio Bassinger wrote:
I've a HTTP server. I intend to run a file upload service. There could be up to 10000 subscribers. Each saving files up to 10 MB. I made a proof-of-concept service using PHP & MySQL, where there is a single database, but many tables - a unique table for each subscriber. But I realize that I may land in trouble with such a huge database. Would it be better to have a separate database for each subscriber? Which approach is better, many tables in 1 database, or many databases with 1 or max 2 tables? Kindly suggest with pros and cons of each.Take a look at bitweaver www.bitweaver.org Fully operational user management and file upload with management that allows it to be fully scalable. It will give you some practical examples at least ;) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/ Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php