Re: Cost of redirect and site domain switch? Good Practice / Bad Practice / Terrible Practice

Jonathan, Yeah that was my intention but, I think search engines will hit you for duped content if you're running two domains same content. So, the idea was to redirect 301 style and have an alias. -T On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Sundquist <jsundquist@gmail.com>wrote: > Depending on how long you have why not just do an alias? No redirect > required. > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Tristan <sunnrunner@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, I need to change from somedomain.com to somenewdomain.com >> >> I was thinking of doing this >> >> 1) create an alias to the site somenewdomain.com to point to current >> server >> 2) run permanent 301 redirect from somedomain.com to somenewdomain.com >> >> >> I was thinking this was a clean safe way to do it so we dont have to run a >> global find replace. >> >> Concerns might be but, I don't know for sure? >> >> 1) SEO >> 2) processing / time / cost for the 301 redirect on any old >> somedomain.comrequests >> >> >> What do you guys think? >> >> Thanks, T >> > >