Re: Validate_HU - don't do releases unless you commit the changes to cvs.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Joe Stump <joe@joestump.net> wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 6:17 PM, Matthew Fonda wrote: > >>> If I haven't heard from either of you in the next few days, I'll pull the >>> releases until the changes get into CVS. >> >> Don't get me wrong--I am definitely in favor of requiring packages to be >> under source control, but I think until there is an RFC passed saying >> packages are required to live in source control, I don't think you should >> pull a release because it isn't. > > Matthew is right. Unless those releases are broken you've got no leg to > stand on to pull the releases. It should be noted that Services_Digg has > *never* been publicly available via a code repository (due to us wanting to > keep new features under wraps while we develop them). I was pretty sure that the group came to a conclusion about making people have the code available in some of the 100 available free SCM systems - except in situations like Digg where we get an explanation and proper rationalisation for it. Having commit history available and the source is very helpful, nay, important for QA :-) - Helgi