Bug #51886 [Opn]: call_user_func() does not propagate the scope

From: Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 07:58:16 +0000
Subject: Bug #51886 [Opn]: call_user_func() does not propagate the scope
References: 1  Groups: php.bugs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-150789@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51886&edit=1

 ID:               51886
 User updated by:  vesko at webstudiobulgaria dot com
 Reported by:      vesko at webstudiobulgaria dot com
 Summary:          call_user_func() does not propagate the scope
 Status:           Open
 Type:             Bug
 Package:          Scripting Engine problem
 Operating System: Debian 5.0
 PHP Version:      5.3SVN-2010-05-22 (snap)

 New Comment:

well, yes or no it has to be consistent. My personal opinion is also
that $this should not be defined, but as I quoted it above according PHP
5.3 policy it should say yes.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-05-25 09:06:41] mike@php.net

doh! From my understanding, this should say "no" *all* 4 times. There's
no t2 instance.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-05-22 16:10:50] vesko at webstudiobulgaria dot com

Description:
------------
call_user_func() does not propagate the scope when used in calls between
two classes that have no child-parent relation. When they have
child-parent relation as described in this bug entry:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47402 it is fine.

As it is put in the "Backward Incompatible Changes" here:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/migration53.incompatible.php
"The call_user_func() family of functions now propagate $this even if
the callee is a parent class. ". I guess it has to do it for classes
that have no relation as well (or if not so the direct call
t2::some_method() should not do it either). As it is at the moment is
inconsistent.

P.S. As well I think a better explanation with an example in the docs
should be added for "The call_user_func() family of functions now
propagate $this even if the callee is a parent class.". It is not clear
at all what it is about if one don't get onto the original bug entry:
"http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47402".
I didnt use the original 47402 entry as in fact it is not a bug.

Test script:
---------------
class t1
{
	public function __call($method,$args) {
		//call_user_func('t2::some_method',$args);//for PHP 5.3
		call_user_func(array('t2','some_method'),$args);
		t2::some_method();
	}
	
	public function existing_method() {
		//call_user_func('t2::some_method');//for PHP 5.3
		call_user_func(array('t2','some_method'));
		t2::some_method();
	}
}

class t2
{
	public function some_method() {
		print isset($this)?'yes':'no';
		print PHP_EOL;
	}
}

$t1 = new t1;

$t1->existing_method();
$t1->non_existing_method();//use overloading

Expected result:
----------------
yes
yes
yes
yes


Actual result:
--------------
no
yes
no
yes


------------------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51886&edit=1


Thread (5 messages)

« previous php.bugs (#150789) next »