Bug #52929 [Com]: Segfault in filter_var with FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL with large amount of data
| From: | neufeind@php.net | Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:00:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #52929 [Com]: Segfault in filter_var with FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL with large amount of data | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-154659@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52929&edit=1
ID: 52929
Comment by: neufeind@php.net
Reported by: neufeind@php.net
Summary: Segfault in filter_var with FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL
with large amount of data
Status: Assigned
Type: Bug
Package: Filter related
PHP Version: 5.3.3
Assigned To: aharvey
Block user comment: N
New Comment:
Well, then how about please at least adding a pre-filter as rasmus
suggested? For the special case (I agree) of email-validation that
should be possible.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-27 08:47:09] aharvey@php.net
Fair call; I'll prosecute the argument for NO_RECURSE elsewhere!
The limit on address length is 320 octets per RFC 2821 (64 octet
local-part + 1 octet "@" + 255 octet domain), so we may as well set
the limit there for now. (If RFC 5336 becomes widespread, that may
need to be revisited, but let's cross that bridge when we come to it.)
Any system that's so stack constrained for that to be an issue is
likely to have other problems anyway. :)
Fix for 5.3 and trunk forthcoming, just as soon as I write a test.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-27 07:24:16] rasmus@php.net
Perhaps a simple pre-filter before we hit the regex. You can't actually
have an
8k email address. There are length limits both before and after the @.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-27 05:21:50] aharvey@php.net
I hate you, Chrome.
Anyway, as I was saying, I'm not terribly comfortable closing this,
since it's likely sites will actually be passing user data straight to
filter_var(). I mean, that's what it's there for. Is it worth
revisiting the decision to compile our bundled libpcre in its default
stack recursive mode? I know NO_RECURSE is slower, but I'm nervous
about potential remote crashers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-27 05:19:58] aharvey@php.net
This is the normal issue with heavily nested regular expressions
exhausting the available stack size. I can upload a backtrace if
there's a sudden desire to see several thousand recursive
invocations of PCRE's match function. :)
I'm not really comfortable closing this, even though we normally just
close
preg_replace
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2010-09-27 02:38:06] neufeind@php.net
Looking at the source at
http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-src/trunk/ext/filter/logical_filters.c?view=markup
I wonder if the problem itself might be in the pcre-lib used since the
email-validation itself is PCRE-based? Fedora Linux here ships with PCRE
7.8.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52929
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52929&edit=1