Bug #55252 [Opn->Dup]: On 64 bit strtotime() mishandles all-zero timestamps
| From: | aharvey@php.net | Date: | Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:42:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #55252 [Opn->Dup]: On 64 bit strtotime() mishandles all-zero timestamps | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-162089@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55252&edit=1
ID: 55252
Updated by: aharvey@php.net
Reported by: cm at fuf dot de
Summary: On 64 bit strtotime() mishandles all-zero timestamps
-Status: Open
+Status: Duplicate
Type: Bug
Package: Date/time related
Operating System: Linux 2.6.38 amd64
PHP Version: 5.3.6
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
This is completely valid, per strtotime()'s documented behaviour: invalid
components within date strings are conformed as best as they can be, and in that
case, you've basically asked for the last day in November in the year -1
(effectively 2 BC).
Closing duplicate, as this has previously been dealt with in bug #53662.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-07-20 11:35:53] cm at fuf dot de
Description:
------------
The behavior of strtotime() on 64 bit machines (see below) for all-zero timestamps is undesirable.
On 32 bit machines the function outputs NULL for a string input "0000-00-00 00:00", on 64
bit machines it yields -62169987600. This is undesirable, as the all-zero timestamp is not a valid
date ("00" is not a month). On 64 bit systems strtotime() should return NULL for
"0000-00-00 00:00".
Test script:
---------------
/* Linux ubuntu64-vbox 2.6.38-8-server #42-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 11 03:49:04 UTC
* 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
* PHP 5.3.6-6~dotdeb.1 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Apr 3 2011 16:36:05)
*/
<?php
echo strtotime("0000-00-00 00:00");
?>
Actual result:
--------------
-62169987600
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=55252&edit=1