Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40837&edit=1
ID: 40837
Updated by: aharvey@php.net
Reported by: nick dot telford at gmail dot com
Summary: static and non-static functions can't have the same
name
Status: Not a bug
Type: Bug
Package: Class/Object related
Operating System: Irrelevant
PHP Version: 5.2.1
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
For the record, there's no way this can be implemented as it stands: for backward compatibility
reasons, instance methods can be called statically, so the name has to be distinct to disambiguate
between static and instance methods. The call type is not enough.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-09-07 22:33:55] accounts dot php at nickawilliams dot com
I also support this proposal. On numerous occasions throughout my career writing
PHP I have found a need for this. While there are workarounds that work, they are
all fairly verbose, convoluted, and/or difficult to follow. Please consider
reopening this!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-08-04 00:46:35] billco at fnarg dot com
Same here! This is a very useful pattern in other languages, where the same method name can be used
in both static and non-static contexts.
For example, a search() method in static context could create a new result object, while the
non-static form would search within an existing result set.
While it is possible to mimic this sort of behaviour by first creating a "blank" object,
it leads to dual-purpose methods (a big "if" statement), resulting in messy,
unmaintainable code. Why arbitrarily force developers to violate good OOP practices ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-06-28 08:15:27] info at renemaas dot de
Yeah this would be really helpful. I hope anybody of the PHP team will implement
this kind of "stupid" feature. If not them please provide a "cool" solution for
using static and non-static functions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-12-21 18:26:14] mac at macnewbold dot com
I agree with martijntje and nick.telford - the static function and normal function of the same name
shouldn't have any conflict, and it would be extremely helpful to be able to define the same
function for use both statically and non-statically.
In the meantime, I'm going to try using __call() and __callStatic() to pretend like this
feature actually exists.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-11-26 22:17:42] martijntje at martijnotto dot nl
I have no idea why this bug is closed as 'bogus'. Just because the documentation
states it is a certain way does not mean that it is right.
I, for one, believe that it should be possible to create both a static and a
member function with the same name. There would never be any confusion as to
which function should be called due to the difference of using the :: or ->
operator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40837
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40837&edit=1