Bug #63893 [Asn->Csd]: poor efficiency of strtr() using array with keys of very different length
| From: | cataphract@php.net | Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #63893 [Asn->Csd]: poor efficiency of strtr() using array with keys of very different length | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-176039@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63893&edit=1
ID: 63893
Updated by: cataphract@php.net
Reported by: scope at planetavent dot de
Summary: poor efficiency of strtr() using array with keys of
very different length
-Status: Assigned
+Status: Closed
Type: Bug
Package: Strings related
Operating System: Windows Server 2008 / RHEL 6.3
PHP Version: 5.4.10
Assigned To: cataphract
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
The fix for this bug has been committed.
Snapshots of the sources are packaged every three hours; this change
will be in the next snapshot. You can grab the snapshot at
http://snaps.php.net/.
For Windows:
http://windows.php.net/snapshots/
Thank you for the report, and for helping us make PHP better.
Fixed in 5.4 and up.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-01-07 02:17:25] cataphract@php.net
My patch so far:
https://github.com/cataphract/php-src/compare/strtr
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2013-01-03 14:34:36] scope at planetavent dot de
Description:
------------
As the documentation of strtr() points out, strtr "... will be the most efficient when all the
keys have the same size".
Using keys of very different lengths results in poor performance, even on very small inputs.
If the str_repeat() for "m" in the test script is adjusted to 20000 the resulting runtime
increases to 45 seconds for strtr() while str_replace() does not increase notably.
There are cases where the replacement array is built dynamically, so there might be little control
over the keylengths. It's easy to expand the example such that strtr() takes several hours
compared to just a few seconds using str_replace().
Test script:
---------------
<?php
$text = str_repeat( 'm', 2000 );
$long_from_a = str_repeat( 'a', 1 );
$long_from_x = str_repeat( 'x', 1500 );
$replacements = array(
$long_from_a => 'b',
$long_from_x => 'y'
);
$start = microtime( true );
$result_1 = strtr( $text, $replacements );
echo "strtr: " . number_format( microtime( true ) - $start, 4 ) . "\n";
$start = microtime( true );
$result_2 = str_replace( array_keys( $replacements ), array_values( $replacements ), $text );
echo "str_replace: " . number_format( microtime( true ) - $start, 4 ) . "\n";
echo $result_1 === $result_2 ? "results match!\n": "no match!\n";
Expected result:
----------------
strtr: 0.0001
str_replace: 0.0001
results match!
Actual result:
--------------
strtr: 2.4203
str_replace: 0.0001
results match!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63893&edit=1