Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66887&edit=1
ID: 66887
Comment by: mruz at poczta dot onet dot pl
Reported by: mruz at poczta dot onet dot pl
Summary: imagescale - poor quality of scaled image
Status: Feedback
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: GD related
Operating System: openSUSE 13.1
PHP Version: 5.5.10
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Yes, if I run imagesetinterpolation before imagescale it works fine.
In this case IMG_BILINEAR_FIXED and IMG_WEIGHTED4 not look nice, the rest of the algorithms is OK.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-03-12 13:54:12] remi@php.net
Can you try with
imagesetinterpolation($oryginal, $alg);
$img = imagescale($oryginal, 600, 400);
$alg option of imagescale is ignored (yes, this is a "goto fail;" bug)
It seems IMG_BILINEAR_FIXED produce this bad quality image.
IMG_BICUBIC_FIXED and IMG_NEAREST_NEIGHBOUR seems to work better.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-03-12 11:18:16] mruz at poczta dot onet dot pl
Bundled, x86_64
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-03-12 11:12:15] pajoye@php.net
Looks like a bug.
Which gd do you use? Bundled or system? See phpinfo
I also need to know which architecture you use (cpu)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-03-12 11:02:25] mruz at poczta dot onet dot pl
Sorry, http://mruz.pl/test/tmp0.jpg , available file
names: tmp[0-20].jpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-03-12 10:55:56] pajoye@php.net
and which result do you get? link pls
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66887--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66887&edit=1