Req #73377 [Opn]: Verbose caching instructions by default.
| From: | rasmus@php.net | Date: | Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:03:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Req #73377 [Opn]: Verbose caching instructions by default. | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-204991@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73377&edit=1
ID: 73377
Updated by: rasmus@php.net
Reported by: inforbano at gmail dot com
Summary: Verbose caching instructions by default.
Status: Open
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: PHP options/info functions
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Check section 4.2:
If an origin server wishes to force a cache to validate every
request, it can assign an explicit expiration time in the past to
indicate that the response is already stale. Compliant caches will
normally validate a stale cached response before reusing it for
subsequent requests (see Section 4.2.4).
That has nothing to do with clockless operation and again says that an explicit expiration date in
the past is allowed. Plus RFC section 14.21 doesn't contain the sentence you quoted at all. It
doesn't say that the expires date cannot be in the past. The only thing it says is:
To mark a response as "already expired," an origin server sends an
Expires date that is equal to the Date header value. (See the rules
for expiration calculations in section 13.2.4.)
which is not the same as saying it cannot be set to an explicit past value, especially since other
parts of the RFC explicitly mentions that it can. If you are going to quote RFCs, please quote them
directly and don't paraphrase.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-10-24 20:32:14] inforbano at gmail dot com
"[...]" in your citation is "without a clock". Have you seen many servers with
PHP engine and without a clock? Anyway, this combination is not typical.
A typical server with PHP has clock. And it automatically generates the Date: header with current
time. The Expires: header with time in the past in this situation is spec violation.
The issue is actual, in particular, because it is unclear, how web-crawlers should treat this
situation. Formally, they can treat it as "the page contains outdated content". Therefore,
rating of the page can be suppressed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-10-24 16:47:09] bwoebi@php.net
You are misreading the RFC, and even RFC 7234 states it's allowed:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-5.3
> An origin server [...] MUST NOT generate an Expires field
unless its value represents a fixed time in the past (always expired)
which is exactly what we want.
â¦
Regarding the issue, I doubt it's an actual issue, but I leave that to other people to
determine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-10-23 10:48:41] inforbano at gmail dot com
What is even worse, according to RFC-2616
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.21
date in Expires: can not be in the past. So, here PHP just violates web-standards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-10-23 10:38:38] inforbano at gmail dot com
Description:
------------
When function session_start(); is used with default options, PHP generates headers like this:
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
This verbose behavior is wrong for the following reasons.
Most PHP-programmers do not need to know anything about caching. Therefore user agents (browsers,
proxies, robots...) MUST have rational behavior (with respect to caching) without any special
instructions from the server. This is only problem of user agents to understand cookies and to
automatically adjust their caching behavior according to their needs.
On the other hand, some meticulous PHP-programmers investigate HTTP-headers of their sites to be
sure that everything is fine. And in this case they just waste their time to study problems, that
are not their.
Test script:
---------------
<?php
session_start();
Expected result:
----------------
No special headers for caching by default.
This is like
session_cache_limiter('');
is set by default.
Actual result:
--------------
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73377&edit=1