Bug #73265 [Asn]: Loading browscap.ini at startup causes high memory usage
| From: | spam2 at rhsoft dot net | Date: | Sun, 18 Dec 2016 00:02:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #73265 [Asn]: Loading browscap.ini at startup causes high memory usage | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-206108@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73265&edit=1
ID: 73265
User updated by: spam2 at rhsoft dot net
Reported by: spam2 at rhsoft dot net
Summary: Loading browscap.ini at startup causes high memory
usage
Status: Assigned
Type: Bug
Package: Performance problem
Operating System: Linux
PHP Version: 7.0.14
Assigned To: nikic
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
> For the server SAPIs it makes sense to load the browscap.ini at startup
honestly i doubt - in case a server has configured it but no application is using get_browser() you
have the full overhead for no good reason
doing the same as happnes at startup but only on-demand when it#s first used would also free the
servers where it is unused from the overhead and for the first get_browser() call it don't make
a difference if that overhead happened at startup or on-demand
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-12-17 20:12:51] nikic@php.net
For the server SAPIs it makes sense to load the browscap.ini at startup, so it's loaded only
once. E.g. if you're using fpm this means it's loaded once and then will be shared (via
cow) across all forked worker processes.
However, I agree that for the cli SAPI it doesn't make sense to load the browscap.ini at
startup -- we don't gain anything by that, but increase memory usage and startup time even if
get_browser() is never used.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-12-17 17:43:59] spam2 at rhsoft dot net
BTW: shouldn't the whole 'browsecap.ini' parsing not only happen when
'get_browser' is the first time called - that would save the whole overhead on a lot of
systems and especially for CLI scripts which don't make use of it at all
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-12-17 15:34:40] spam2 at rhsoft dot net
thanks foor the feedback and especially for the patch - the numbers are damned impressive!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-12-17 15:32:25] nikic@php.net
Compiled patterns are cached across requests. The cache size is limited (IIRC 4k patterns).
get_browser() with the current implementation and the large browscap.ini file matches significantly
more than 4k patterns on each call, so you don't benefit from the caching (as patterns are
displaced before they can be used again).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-12-17 14:45:54] spam2 at rhsoft dot net
is the result of the prce-jit somewhere stored between requests?
i still try to understand what goes up behind the scenes
without the pcre-jit 3 preg_replace() and 2 preg_match() goes up from 1.22 / 0.54% runtime costs to
15% (higly optimized core-cms) and so the JIT makes a really perofrmance boost - but looking at the
source i have 5 different patterns and so within the request there is hardly a reuse and only reuse
within requests could explain a benefit
that would also explain the dramatical memory usage of browscap but on the other hand not the drop
of get_browser() within a loop instead make if faster after the first call
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73265
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73265&edit=1