Bug #74470 [Com]: FILTER VALIDATE EMAIL and To be valid emails

From: Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:05:55 +0000
Subject: Bug #74470 [Com]: FILTER VALIDATE EMAIL and To be valid emails
References: 1  Groups: php.bugs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-208660@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=74470&edit=1 ID: 74470 Comment by: spam2 at rhsoft dot net Reported by: cemardaakin at yandex dot com Summary: FILTER VALIDATE EMAIL and To be valid emails Status: Not a bug Type: Bug Package: Filter related Operating System: windows PHP Version: 5.6.30 Block user comment: N Private report: N New Comment: > we are talking about validate and i think validate filters should be reallistic god damned NO they should be CORRECT - no i am not a php upstream develper but just shocked about that much ignorance which explains so many weird behavior of software we have enough broken software and you demand another one.... Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2017-04-18 23:03:38] cemardaakin at yandex dot com we are talking about validate and i think validate filters should be reallistic. If i have a software developed with php,i don't want accept like as "bla'@com" from web forms. I think a lot of webmasters don't want like "blabla'@com" emails in their databases and need another functions for filter. If FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL had a flag for strong filter,it was be most useful > fmargaine@php.net I am sorry for this situation,I thought this was a mistake ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2017-04-18 22:57:50] fmargaine@php.net Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php This is expected behavior. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2017-04-18 22:37:56] spam2 at rhsoft dot net "but is it usefull" is not the qestion when it comes to validation enough fools out there decided that the + sign is not useful and hence not accepted in webforms while it's perfect legal and on a proper mailserver would put mails in the subfolder "test" in case of "test+xxx@xecmplaec.com" > did you mean "i can use like that email" ? :) yes, if not some random fool decides that he don't care about RFC's and reject it ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2017-04-18 22:32:57] cemardaakin at yandex dot com I know,blabla'@email.com type is correct for universal types but is it usefull ? did you mean "i can use like that email" ? :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2017-04-18 22:25:46] spam2 at rhsoft dot net you think... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Local-part ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=74470 -- Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=74470&edit=1

« previous php.bugs (#208660) next »