Bug #76215 [Opn->Nab]: 7.3: strip_tags deprecation of "allowed_tags"
| From: | requinix@php.net | Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2018 07:35:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #76215 [Opn->Nab]: 7.3: strip_tags deprecation of "allowed_tags" | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-214719@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=76215&edit=1
ID: 76215
Updated by: requinix@php.net
Reported by: spam2 at rhsoft dot net
Summary: 7.3: strip_tags deprecation of "allowed_tags"
-Status: Open
+Status: Not a bug
Type: Bug
Package: Scripting Engine problem
PHP Version: Next Minor Version
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Take this to the internals list.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2018-04-13 07:33:40] spam2 at rhsoft dot net
Description:
------------
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_7_3
strip_tags()
From some preliminary feedback: We might want to only deprecate the insecure allowed_tags parameter,
but keep the ?strip all tags? functionality. This function appears to be useful as a relatively
simple way of reusing code that outputs HTML in a different context (CLI output, text messages,
etc.)
what the hell do you gain with that?
how is a param nobody is forced to use unsecure?
i have a simple usecase which is *not* unsecure and i don't see any gain in break that: working
in a WYSIWG-editor, cleanup pasted content and have a few checkboxes which tags should survive
* headlines
* paragraphs
* <ul>, <ol>, <li>
* tables
default is strip everything
in fact that works way better than all the existing javascript crap and in PHP it's a one-liner
with a simple from-post and replace the WYSIWG-content where you could write any html code anyways
in source-mode
so again: what do you gain with remove functionality?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=76215&edit=1