Req #75388 [Com]: Argon2: Add secret/key
| From: | davidapgilman at gmail dot com | Date: | Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:50:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Req #75388 [Com]: Argon2: Add secret/key | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-220239@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=75388&edit=1
ID: 75388
Comment by: davidapgilman at gmail dot com
Reported by: phpdoc at mail dot my1 dot info
Summary: Argon2: Add secret/key
Status: Assigned
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: *Encryption and hash functions
Operating System: Win8.1 x64
PHP Version: Next Minor Version
Assigned To: jedisct1
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
I concur with the OP - the best way to use a pepper with Argon2 is to use the built in
"secret" parameter. There are workarounds as suggested, but the most elegant, audited, and
cryptographically secure method is to use the built-in secret parameter as designed.
I understand if there are higher priority PRs, but it's negligent and ignorant to choose to
leave off a built-in security feature of the PHC winner. You're encouraging developers to roll
their own encryption at worst, and forcing them to choose between a number of non-intuitive
workarounds at best. I'd like to re-request this feature.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2018-06-16 16:22:53] phpdoc at mail dot my1 dot info
@jedisct1
last time I checked, the ability of using arbitrary salts wasnt available for
PASSWORD_ARGON2I and only for PASSWORD_BCRYPT and even that is deprecated.
and as stange already says it is exposed by other languages and on top of it, it is a part of argon.
why should one go with playing on the salt using a pseudorandom function with both a self made salt
and a secret if argon can accept secrets by itself and just use that?
also it's probably more secure than a self-built workaround anyway.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2018-03-29 15:08:56] jedisct1@php.net
If you really need this, don't store the salt itself. Generate and store a random
s, and use prf(k, s) as the salt. This is equivalent to adding a secret
key to the initial Argon2 state.
A major drawback is the fact that keys cannot be rotated.
A way better approach is to encrypt the hashes. You may also want to add an authentication tag that
includes the salt and parameters, to prevent resources starvation if the parameters get modified
while still allowing parameter updates.
Authenticated encryption is beyond the scope of a password hashing function. Combining both in a
simple way is an API's responsibility.
libsodium 2.x will use the libhydrogen API, but the password hashing API might be backported to the
1.x branch: https://github.com/jedisct1/libhydrogen/wiki/Password-hashing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2018-03-29 14:07:22] stange at digitalriver dot com
The secret is an important feature with argon2. Other languages expose it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2018-03-29 14:07:19] stange at digitalriver dot com
The secret is an important feature with argon2. Other languages expose it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2017-10-17 16:20:53] cmb@php.net
Feedback has been provided, so opening again.
Assigning to Frank, since he implemented the argon2 password hashing for PHP,
and apparently doesn't like non-replaceable keys[1]. Besides, using the secret
key doesn't appear to work with argon2*_hash_encoded().
[1] <https://github.com/P-H-C/phc-winner-argon2/issues/222>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=75388
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=75388&edit=1