Req #78270 [Com]: Usage of __vectorcall convention with FFI
| From: | lisachenko dot it at gmail dot com | Date: | Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:29:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Req #78270 [Com]: Usage of __vectorcall convention with FFI | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-221891@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=78270&edit=1
ID: 78270
Comment by: lisachenko dot it at gmail dot com
Reported by: lisachenko dot it at gmail dot com
Summary: Usage of __vectorcall convention with FFI
Status: Feedback
Type: Feature/Change Request
Package: Unknown/Other Function
Operating System: Windows x64
PHP Version: 7.4.0alpha2
Assigned To: cmb
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
Unfortunately, recompiling PHP with custom ZEND_FASTCALL doesn't change anything. Nobody will
do this for general purposes, so in my opinion, we shouldn't affect overall performance by
dropping this call convention, as it is a step back.
However I have an interesting idea. What if we could solve this in another way, by defining all
internal API functions as ZEND_FASTCALL and removing ZEND_API macros for them, thus they won't
be exposed outside. And select some useful methods to work with internal structures with ZEND_API,
but without declaring them as ZEND_FASTCALL convention.
I can see some conflicts in presence of both ZEND_API and ZEND_FASTCALL. Because in some places the
macros ZENA_API is present and in another it is absent, like with ZEND_FASTCALL.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-07-22 10:56:28] cmb@php.net
I don't see a good *general* solution here. Assuming that
#define ZEND_FASTCALL __vectorcall yields a more performant
binary than #define ZEND_FASTCALL, we would have to sacrifice
performance for the supposedly rare case when someone wants to use
such functions via FFI.
A compromise might be to let the configuration override the
definition in zend_portability.h, e.g. something like the attached
patch, so it would be possible to do
set CFLAGS=/D ZEND_FASTCALL= & configure â¦
Would that be sufficent for you, Alexander, or would you want the
official binaries to be built without __vectorcall?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-07-22 10:56:25] cmb@php.net
The following patch has been added/updated:
Patch Name: override-zend-fastcall
Revision: 1563792985
URL: https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=78270&patch=override-zend-fastcall&revision=1563792985
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-07-21 04:22:04] php-bugs at lists dot php dot net
No feedback was provided. The bug is being suspended because
we assume that you are no longer experiencing the problem.
If this is not the case and you are able to provide the
information that was requested earlier, please do so and
change the status of the bug back to "Re-Opened". Thank you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-07-11 14:53:28] lisachenko dot it at gmail dot com
I've checked the source code of libffi. Zero lines about vectorcall, so unlikely that this
convention is supported right now.
x32 was typo, there should be "x86" of course. You can start debug this with simple
attempt to import zend_atoi function under Windows platform which is declared as following:
ZEND_API int ZEND_FASTCALL zend_atoi(const char *str, size_t str_len);
Minimal reproduced case:
<?php
$vectorcallBug = FFI::cdef("extern int zend_atoi(const char *str, size_t str_len);",
'php7.dll');
$vectorcallBug->zend_atoi(); // Good if we can see an exception about invalid argument number
But now we can get only this: Fatal error: Uncaught FFI\Exception: Failed resolving C function
'zend_atoi'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2019-07-11 01:35:11] ab@php.net
Thanks for the report. The vectorcall calling convention for 64-bit is the analogue of fastcall on
32-bit. 64-bit supports a very few calling conventions, vectorcall is the most advanced one compared
to both default 64-bit and to fastcall.
The latest libffi has been released quite a long ago, it might make sense to check whether the
latest dev supports vectorcall. It would be also the preferable way, as vectorcall is per se a far
better option than the default x64 calling convention. Performance improvements was the reason
switching to it back then, and removing it just out of hand without a good QA would be IMO a no go.
On a case-by-case base, one could check where such a switch wouldn't impact, but for sure not
just a blanket removal.
Also not sure the note about x32, did you mean x86? Also, could you please put a piece of code one
could start with? Perhaps a list of functions where the issue was met.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=78270
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=78270&edit=1