Bug #81084 [Com]: PDOStatement::queryString is uninitialized
| From: | corey dot taylor dot fl at gmail dot com | Date: | Fri, 28 May 2021 16:17:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #81084 [Com]: PDOStatement::queryString is uninitialized | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-234082@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=81084&edit=1
ID: 81084
Comment by: corey dot taylor dot fl at gmail dot com
Reported by: corey dot taylor dot fl at gmail dot com
Summary: PDOStatement::queryString is uninitialized
Status: Open
Type: Bug
Package: PDO Core
PHP Version: master-Git-2021-05-26 (Git)
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
The cake database wrapper is too large to show here, but the reason the queryString is checked in a
mock scenario is the SQLite driver checks the query post-execute. There's just too much code to
completely split up every line in a mock/test scenario so this kind of stuff still runs.
The mock scenario makes it hard to determine if $queryString "should" already be
initialized in the driver. We tried tracking things like "ensure execute was called", but
the mock scenario created an invalid PDOStatement so that made no difference.
I think the argument that properties can only be initialized by other code is contrary to other
argument seen in php dev that all properties should be initialized by the constructor.
That said, allowing us to initialize the queryString as needed in a one time, "readonly"
style would definitely work. That would actually help us test code triggering this error in a mock
up properly.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-05-28 09:09:26] nikic@php.net
Thanks for the explanation -- this coming up in a mock scenario makes sense to me.
Could it be that your original reason for the
if ($statement->queryString) check was
this mock scenerio as well? Because I don't think it would ever fail in other cases.
I think that the best solution here would be to construct the mock with the property initialized:
$queryString = 'SELECT 1 FROM sqlite_master WHERE name =
"sqlite_sequence"';
$statement = $this->getMockBuilder('\PDOStatement')
->onlyMethods(['execute', 'rowCount', 'closeCursor',
'fetchAll'])
->getMock();
$statement->queryString = $queryString;
$driver->getConnection()->expects($this->once())
->method('prepare')
->with($queryString)
->will($this->returnValue($statement));
Because then, the code would see the same value it would see in a non-mock scenario.
Unfortunately, this will currently result in:
> Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Property queryString is read only
However, I think we can relax this to allow an assignment as long as the property is still
uninitialized. Nowadays our understanding of "read-only" is really "init-once",
so that would be in line.
Would this work for you?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-05-27 15:40:57] corey dot taylor dot fl at gmail dot com
So, the actual issue code generating the issue is not what I thought. We do create PDOStatement
through prepare(), but it seems these failures are from a mock object.
We assumed it was generating it for all queries. Your initial assessment is probably close to
correct.
$statement = $this->getMockBuilder('\PDOStatement')
->onlyMethods(['execute', 'rowCount', 'closeCursor',
'fetchAll'])
->getMock();
$driver->getConnection()->expects($this->once())
->method('prepare')
->with('SELECT 1 FROM sqlite_master WHERE name =
"sqlite_sequence"')
->will($this->returnValue($statement));
$statement->expects($this->once())
->method('fetchAll')
->will($this->returnValue(['1']));
$statement->method('execute')->will($this->returnValue(true));
$table = new TableSchema('articles');
$result = $table->truncateSql($connection);
$this->assertCount(2, $result);
$this->assertSame('DELETE FROM sqlite_sequence WHERE
name="articles"', $result[0]);
$this->assertSame('DELETE FROM "articles"', $result[1]);
It would be nice if we could somehow generate PDOStatement's in a mock scenario, but if that
requires "isset()" because PDOStatement cannot initialize the property, then we can handle
that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-05-27 09:46:19] nikic@php.net
Would it be possible to share a snippet (not necessarily runnable on 3v4l) where this occurs when
going through the PDO::prepare() API?
Based on my reading of the code we will always initialize $queryString when PDO creates the
PDOStatement
(https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/ae6c1b0c4ff3468cbc14ffaaaee4e5dc6e480427/ext/pdo/pdo_dbh.c#L457-L460)
and I wasn't able to create an uninitialized $queryString via PDO::prepare() in some simple
experiments. I'm probably missing something really basic here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-05-27 09:31:22] corey dot taylor dot fl at gmail dot com
We are not manually instantiating the PDOStatement. That was clearly just a simple snippet that
would run in that environment.
The statement is generated by a call to "PDO::prepare()".
The use of $queryString in this instance is determining if certain drivers need a post-execute query
such as SQLite for a row count.
Since we didn't know how to tell if the query string was available, we were using something
like "if ($statement->queryString)". However, that now throws an error since it's
uninitialized.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-05-27 08:09:43] nikic@php.net
I'm generally open to making this nullable, but would first like to understand how you ended up
in this situation.
The reason why we decided that it's okay to make it non-nullable, is that the only way to end
up with an uninitialized $queryString is if you don't create the PDOStatement through the PDO
API and instead do something like "new PDOStatement". This is an illegal operation and the
resulting object will throw "Error: PDO object is uninitialized" for all method calls. Now
it will also throw an Error when accessing its only property, so that seems sensible and consistent.
(Ideally we'd throw when you do "new PDOStatement" in the first place, but
unfortunately this interferes with the ability to extend PDOStatement, thus we get the current
situation where the object can be created but throws on all operations.)
Is my assumption about how you can end up with an uninitialized $queryString wrong? Is there some
other pathway besides "new PDOStatement()"? If no, why are you creating / interacting with
this kind of object?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=81084
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=81084&edit=1