Bug #81554 [Asn->Wfx]: RecursiveIteratorIterator still calls ->getChildren() when depth reaches limit

From: Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:21:53 +0000
Subject: Bug #81554 [Asn->Wfx]: RecursiveIteratorIterator still calls ->getChildren() when depth reaches limit
References: 1  Groups: php.bugs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-237503@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=81554&edit=1

 ID:                 81554
 Updated by:         cmb@php.net
 Reported by:        dktapps at pmmp dot io
 Summary:            RecursiveIteratorIterator still calls
                     ->getChildren() when depth reaches limit
-Status:             Assigned
+Status:             Wont fix
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            SPL related
 Operating System:   Windows
 PHP Version:        8.0.12
 Assigned To:        cmb
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

Okay, I'm closing as WONTFIX (for the most part this is not a bug,
but since some edge-cases could be improved …)


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-10-28 16:01:20] dktapps at pmmp dot io

I guess you're right. I originally discovered this issue in PHPStan, which uses Symfony/Finder
to discover dead files in its cache, which is zero levels deep and only involves files. But I
don't think Symfony uses LEAVES_ONLY for this (some complicated FilterIterator), so I guess it
wouldn't see any benefit anyway.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-10-28 14:51:16] cmb@php.net

Actually, the inner iterator's ::hasChildren() is called (not
::getChildren)[1].  This is necessary even when the max depth is
reached to determine whether to include the item in the iteration
(if it has no children, and ::LEAVES_ONLY is set) or not.
Unfortunately, RecursiveDirectoryIterator::hasChildren() may cause
up to two stat calls, and these are indeed particularly slow on
Windows.

The only possible optimization I see would be not to call
::hasChildren() if ::LEAVES_ONLY is not set, but that wouldn't
help in your case, and in many other cases since ::LEAVES_ONLY is
the default and likely used most of the time.

Do you agree that this edge-case is not worth optimizing?

[1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/php-7.4.25/ext/spl/spl_iterators.c#L266-L317>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-10-25 15:39:45] dktapps at pmmp dot io

Description:
------------
When a RecursiveIteratorIterator's depth reaches the limit, it still may call its
sub-iterator's getChildren(). This manifests as performance degradation when using the below
script on a directory with many thousands of files in it.

This can be observed by replacing the iterators with a FilesystemIterator, which by
default won't recurse anyway. As a result, it's 2 orders of magnitude faster than a
RecursiveIteratorIterator with depth 0.

With the target folder containing 30k files (NTFS on a PCIe Gen4 SSD):
- RecursiveDirectoryIterator + maxDepth(0) takes 3.7 seconds
- FilesystemIterator takes 0.03 seconds.

This is most observable on Windows due to Windows' abysmal I/O performance.

Test script:
---------------
Slow script:
<?php


$iterator = new RecursiveDirectoryIterator(sys_get_temp_dir() .
'/phpstan/cache/nette.configurator');
$iterator2 = new RecursiveIteratorIterator($iterator);
$iterator2->setMaxDepth(0);
$start = hrtime(true);
foreach($iterator2 as $item){

}
var_dump(number_format(hrtime(true) - $start));

--------
Fast script:
<?php

$iterator2 = new FilesystemIterator(sys_get_temp_dir() .
'/phpstan/cache/nette.configurator');
$start = hrtime(true);
foreach($iterator2 as $item){

}
var_dump(number_format(hrtime(true) - $start));


Expected result:
----------------
The two scripts should be somewhere in the same order of magnitude of performance.

Actual result:
--------------
The fast script is more than 100x faster than the slow one.


------------------------------------------------------------------------



--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=81554&edit=1


Thread (4 messages)

« previous php.bugs (#237503) next »