Bug #80047 [Csd]: DatePeriod doesn't support custom DateTimeImmutable
| From: | cmb@php.net | Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2022 11:38:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #80047 [Csd]: DatePeriod doesn't support custom DateTimeImmutable | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-242010@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=80047&edit=1
ID: 80047
Updated by: cmb@php.net
Reported by: oognic at gmail dot com
Summary: DatePeriod doesn't support custom DateTimeImmutable
Status: Closed
Type: Bug
Package: Date/time related
PHP Version: 7.2.33
Assigned To: derick
Block user comment: N
Private report: N
New Comment:
> The DateTime/DateTimeImmutable classes should have been "final", [â¦]
I agree. So maybe we should be consequent, and deprecate
subclassing these classes, and make them final in the future.
Overall, that might still be better than having *some*
restrictions, and sometimes strange behavior.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2022-07-25 10:47:14] derick@php.net
Hi Kyle,
That *now* was meant to be *not* in my text.
There are a few issues here:
- PHP can't return your original class, as calling userland constructors from internals land
constructors is not reliable.
- The DateTime/DateTimeImmutable classes should have been "final", which would have meant
Carbon and others should have used composition instead of inheritance.
- Casting to the "source" class isn't really the right solution either, but indeed
probably the best one (although not really 100% accurate either, of course) â and it would also
probably break BC for 8.0/8.1.
I would therefore suggest that for 8.0/8.1, I back out this change and replace it with a "cast
to original source", but leave it in place for PHP 8.2, as it makes it much more clear that the
DatePeriod iterator can't deal with inherited classes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2022-07-24 18:50:35] kylekatarnls at gmail dot com
Hi Derick, you say "The fix that I have committed is to *now* allow inherited objects
here." but it actually does the opposite, which is not addressing the issue but creating an
other one.
This change will forbid sub-classes of DateTime/DateTimeImmutable it would be quite tough to handle
this breaking change as of PHP 8.2, but if you release in 8.0.22, there is nothing we can do to
prevent our libraries doing this not to blow up when users will update PHP (as they won't
necessarily update in the same time their libraries, such as Carbon which construct DatePeriod with
Carbon instances (sub-classes of DateTime) and so thousands apps that might potentially use this).
From Liskov substitution principle (SOLID) accepting a parameter T should mean acceptance of any
class implementing T (if it's an interface) or extending T (if it's a class).
IMHO, fixing as suggested in this ticket (casting to the source class) would be the only correct
fix. If it can't be done, I think we should live with this inconsistent output and users would
have to re-create the correct object from the raw DateTime or DateTimeImmutable (this is what we do
in Carbon), but restricting the input is far worse.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2022-06-25 16:53:45] git@php.net
Automatic comment on behalf of derickr
Revision: https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/973c3f6e241227ffc14c3608c774d7636b798cec
Log: Fixed #80047: DatePeriod doesn't warn with custom DateTimeImmutable
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2022-06-24 10:22:21] derick@php.net
The fix for this bug has been committed.
If you are still experiencing this bug, try to check out latest source from https://github.com/php/php-src and re-test.
Thank you for the report, and for helping us make PHP better.
The fix that I have committed is to *now* allow inherited objects here.
The DatePeriod iterator needs to construct DateTime/DateTimeImmutable objects which can only done by
copying internal data, which can't be recreated by calling the constructor of an inherited
class. This data needs to be directly injected into a (new) DateTime/DateTimeImmutable object.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2020-09-03 12:01:06] oognic at gmail dot com
Description:
------------
If we create a custom class that inherits from DateTimeImmutable, this class can be given as
parameter to DatePeriod.
However, when iterating or trying to get the start or end dates, DatePeriod will try to return
instances of our custom class but without using its constructor, which will produce incoherent
objects.
See this PR for more details: https://github.com/thecodingmachine/safe/pull/227/files
Test script:
---------------
<?php
class CustomDateTimeImmutable extends \DateTimeImmutable {
private $foo;
public function __construct($time = "now", $timezone = NULL)
{
parent::__construct($time, $timezone);
$this->foo = "foo";
}
public function getFoo()
{
return $this->foo;
}
}
$datePeriod = new \DatePeriod(new CustomDateTimeImmutable('2020-01-01'), new
\DateInterval('P1D'), (new
CustomDateTimeImmutable('2020-01-03'))->modify('+1 day'));
var_dump($datePeriod->getStartDate()->getFoo());
$strings = [];
foreach ($datePeriod as $date) {
var_dump($date->getFoo());
}
Expected result:
----------------
"foo"
"foo"
"foo"
"foo"
Actual result:
--------------
NULL
NULL
NULL
NULL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=80047&edit=1