Bug #72666 [Opn]: touch(): stat cache clearing inconsistent between file:// paths and plain paths
| From: | bukka@php.net | Date: | Fri, 15 Dec 2023 13:21:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Bug #72666 [Opn]: touch(): stat cache clearing inconsistent between file:// paths and plain paths | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-246052@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=72666&edit=1
ID: 72666
Updated by: bukka@php.net
Reported by: phofstetter at sensational dot ch
Summary: touch(): stat cache clearing inconsistent between
file:// paths and plain paths
Status: Open
Type: Bug
-Package: Streams related
+Package: *Directory/Filesystem functions
Operating System: MacOS X and Linux
PHP Version: 7.1.0beta1
Block user comment: Y
Private report: N
New Comment:
I have to say I'm a bit doubtful of stat cache advantages but we would need to measure it.
Thinking about this I think it would make sense to fix the mentioned function to clear the stat
cache. I'm not sure if we should do that in bug fixing release though but it seems like a clear
bug to me so probably yeah.
Changing package as stream part works fine.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-09-04 19:53:45] kevin at lyda dot ie
Related To: Bug #28790
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2021-09-04 19:06:56] kevin at lyda dot ie
There are a long list of functions that would need to be updated as this is due to the stat cache.
Among the functions that would need to be updated: touch(), fopen(), fread(), fwrite(). The unlink()
function already does the update. There's also an argument that exec() and related functions
should be updated to invalidate the stat cache.
See bug 28790 for more info and a possible, more reliable, solution.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-07-25 11:10:38] phofstetter at sensational dot ch
ok. Thank you.
I'll prepare a PR then that clears the cache when touch() is used.
What about clearing the cache when fopen() is used with any of the writable flags?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-07-25 11:02:44] ab@php.net
As mentioned on ML, I'd doubt the removal is justified. The most of usage scenarios only profit
from the caching, while in other cases cache can be explicitly reset. I/O is one of the usual
bottlenecks, even today. So more like expected behavior.
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2016-07-25 07:37:00] phofstetter at sensational dot ch
Description:
------------
When calling touch() on a plain path, the stat cache doesn't get cleared. However, when calling
touch() on a 'file://' URL, the stat cache gets cleared by virtue of
php_plain_files_metadata which clears the stat cache after all operations.
This leads to the behaviour as shown in the test script (output available here: https://3v4l.org/0VQIo)
Furthermore: fopen(), fwrite(), fclose() does not clear the stat cache in either case and neither
does file_put_contents().
I would create a PR to fix the touch() case, but in general, it's probably worth reconsidering
the usefulness of the stat-cache these days. Even over an NFS link, when doing nothing but
stat()'ing, you still only lose about 10% performance if you call clearstatcache() after every
stat().
Plus, the cache really only helps when you continuously stat() the same file within the same
request, which probably isn't correct application behaviour anyways.
So in general, I would propose to actually kill the stat cache which would fix this inconsistency as
well :-)
Test script:
---------------
<?php
// doesn't update realpath cache
touch('/tmp/foo');
var_dump(filemtime('/tmp/foo'));
touch('/tmp/foo', 1);
var_dump(filemtime('/tmp/foo'));
// does update the realpath cache
touch('file:///tmp/foo');
var_dump(filemtime('file:///tmp/foo'));
touch('file:///tmp/foo', 1);
var_dump(filemtime('file:///tmp/foo'));
Expected result:
----------------
int(1469202653)
int(1)
int(1469202653)
int(1)
Actual result:
--------------
int(1469202653)
int(1469202653)
int(1469202653)
int(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=72666&edit=1