#20737 [Bgs]: PHP has Apache 2 support?
| From: | philip@php.net | Date: | Sun, 01 Dec 2002 02:01:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | #20737 [Bgs]: PHP has Apache 2 support? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-26263@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 20737
Updated by: philip@php.net
Reported By: glen.mules@verizon.net
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: *Configuration Issues
Operating System: Red Hat Linux 7.3
PHP Version: 4.3.0RC2
New Comment:
Maybe INSTALL should have a small note regarding apache 2.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-11-30 18:36:07] sniper@php.net
Sorry, but your problem does not imply a bug in PHP itself. For a
list of more appropriate places to ask for help using PHP, please
visit http://www.php.net/support.php as this bug system
is not the
appropriate forum for asking support questions.
Thank you for your interest in PHP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-11-30 12:52:43] msopacua@php.net
> And, regardless, assuming that PHP has Apache 2 support, > the
wording in the installation should be changed from
>
> ... Apache 1.x module ...
That should actually give you a hint.
Did you use --with-apxs= or --with-apxs2= ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-11-30 12:41:42] glen.mules@verizon.net
Since I am commenting anyway, where can one get the PHP-Bug reporting
system software. It is rather good.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-11-30 12:39:59] glen.mules@verizon.net
And, regardless, assuming that PHP has Apache 2 support, the wording in
the installation should be changed from
... Apache 1.x module ...
No? It is somewhat misleading to someone hitting another bug and
wondering whether Apache 2 is supported.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2002-11-30 12:36:49] glen.mules@verizon.net
/usr/bin/perl -v
gives appropriate response. Thus appears to be valid perl interpreter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
http://bugs.php.net/20737
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=20737&edit=1