#22758 [Fbk->Opn]: performance problem with apache2 handler

ID: 22758 User updated by: bibifoc23 at yahoo dot fr Reported By: bibifoc23 at yahoo dot fr -Status: Feedback +Status: Open Bug Type: Apache2 related Operating System: Linux 2.4 PHP Version: 4.3.2RC1 New Comment: I use prefork for apache2 and the following command line for php and apache: ./configure --with-mpm=prefork --prefix=/app/apache2 ./configure --prefix=/app/php432 --with-config-file-path=/app/php432 --enable-sigchild --enable-inline-optimization --without-mysql --without-pear --with-ldap --with-apxs2=/app/apache2/bin/apxs Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2003-03-25 08:35:23] iliaa@php.net Which ap2 model are you using, worker or prefork? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2003-03-21 03:13:07] bibifoc23 at yahoo dot fr I run test with 2 PC--> one linux 2.4 as server and w2k as client. i use ab -n1000 -c5 http://server.toto.fr/test.php result with handler: 60.02 req/s without failed request. 200 ko/s cpu is 100% for the client near 100% for the server result with filter: 200 req/s without failed request 600 ko/s cpu is 25% for the client 100 % for the server the size of the html code is 3k. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2003-03-21 01:08:37] magnus@php.net Set correct status. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2003-03-20 22:53:07] ianh@php.net Hi. can you give us some numbers? also how are you running the test. you need to run on 2 seperate machines. Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2003-03-18 05:13:16] bibifoc23 at yahoo dot fr When i test the performance of the new apache2handler sapi, there is a huge difference with apache2filter sapi. <?php phpinfo(); ?> or <?php for ($i=0; $<100;$i++) echo $i; ?> On Redhat 7.3 and apache 2.0.44, the apache2filter give a better result than the apache2handler. i compil php with the same module in both case. Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22758&edit=1