#23407 [Fbk]: dns_get_record should support more RR types
| From: | pollita@php.net | Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:32:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | #23407 [Fbk]: dns_get_record should support more RR types | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.bugs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-bugs+get-38767@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 23407
Updated by: pollita@php.net
Reported By: axelm at nic dot at
Status: Feedback
Bug Type: Feature/Change Request
Operating System: n/a
PHP Version: 4.3.2RC2
-Assigned To:
+Assigned To: pollita
New Comment:
Well, I found the RFCs (2052 SRV and 2915 NAPTR) but I'd still like to
see some samples to help make sure I understand their use properly.
I havn't looked through NAPTR yet, but SRV looks very cool, I often
wondered why there was no protocol non-specific version of MX.
I'm assigning this to myself to update dns_get_record() and will look
into the feasability of integrating these lookups into the url fopen
wrappers and possibly (but less likely) the win32 (socket based)
implementation of mail().
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2003-04-29 13:33:19] pollita@php.net
I'm all for it. The function's range of support however, was limited
by the resource records I was familiar enough with to be able to test
and process. If you'd like to provide samples of the usage of other
records (like the ones you mentioned) and (even better) a link to the
RFC which describes their use and behavior, I'd be happy to add them
in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2003-04-29 08:05:12] axelm at nic dot at
Why add a new function to PHP which supports only a subset of
known/used DNS RR's? Several types (e.g. SRV, NAPTR) will gain in
importance over the next few months/years, so why not include them from
start?
just my 0.02EUR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=23407&edit=1