Bug #16666 Updated: Ask for re-naming DOM XML extension functions according to W3C DOM

ID: 16666 Updated by: robert@webmotion.com Reported By: stepan.rybar@ceu.cz Status: Closed Bug Type: Feature/Change Request Operating System: MS Win2000 (not important) PHP Version: 4.2.0 New Comment: justToBeArgumentativeSinceThisIsMyPreferredStyle rather than the fy_i_v_lwwds_t style ;) addSlashes() htmlEntities() quoteMeta() stripSlashes() ucWords() wordWrap() imageCreate() imageFill() rawUrlEncode() And while I know these are all probably encoded as lowercase and the fact they can be uppercased is merely that functions are insensitive, I do believe that it makes the point :) Cheers, Rob. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-17 16:07:19] mfischer@php.net Unlikely to happen. This would break 1000² of scripts. I hope you know what I mean. OTOH, IMHO that's just syntentic sugar. Many people do not like to read in StUYcApS and find this_style_easier_to_read. And, it's the PHP naming convention to use_this_style. I bet you're out of luck. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-17 14:01:31] stepan.rybar@ceu.cz Hello! I like to see DOM XML extension in PHP. I often use it in browser's (client-side) programming using JavaScript, so I am surprised, why the functions of this extension is named as today. It is a confusing for me and think not only form me. According to W3C DOM standards functions looks like "getAttribute" and not "get_attribute" etc. I hope, that You know what I mean. Thank You. Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=16666&edit=1