Bug #16763 Updated: '<?=', and '<%=' are equivalent to echo, but '<?php=' is not

ID: 16763 Updated by: yohgaki@php.net Reported By: tbrinkman@cinci.rr.com -Status: Closed +Status: Open -Bug Type: Feature/Change Request +Bug Type: Documentation problem Operating System: ALL PHP Version: 4.2.0 New Comment: Removing <?= and <%= works, too ;) We are sure now. There will be people curious about not having <?php=, since there are <?= and <%=. It looks we are better to document about echo short cut, explicitly. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-25 19:27:03] rasmus@php.net Removing <?= would also improve consistency. I don't buy the consistency argument. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-25 19:13:34] yohgaki@php.net I porposed the same thing monthes ago. I agree. It's strange not to have <?php= since <?php tag is the only portable tag. Anyway, in PHP, there are too many inconsistency to note and it's one of them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-25 17:36:03] tbrinkman@cinci.rr.com Do you mind if I ask why not? It's half-way implemented as it stands. Both of the 'short form' tags support the behavior, what was the reasoning behind not supporting it in the 'long form' tag? Other than Rasmus's claim that he '...can't think of anything uglier and less sensical...". If that was the reason for not fully supporting the form, why was it partially implemented in the first place? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-23 15:22:44] jimw@php.net this was discussed to death on php-dev. it's not going to happen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-04-23 15:05:37] tbrinkman@cinci.rr.com Seeing as how '<?=' and '<%=' are both equivalent to '<?php echo', I kind of figure that '<?php=' should also be equivalent, but it is not. Having run into this before, I asked about it and somebody told me it was in the works to get taken care of for 4.2.0. I checked and it doesn't seem to be fixed, so I decided to do a bit of hunting to see if it was within my capabilites. I *think* I've found the changes which need to be made, but I'm not absolutely certain. Having searched through all of the source code for all occurrances of '<%=' and '<?=', I discovered that they only exist (outside of comments) in one source file. That said, I *believe* that the following changes to php-4.2.0\Zend\zend_language_scanner.l would cause '<?php=' to become equivalent to '<?php echo' just as the other, shorter tags allow. I don't know how to make an actual patch file, or where to submit it so here goes. First is the two-line change to zend_language_scanner.l that would seem to enable the shorthand. Second is the one-line change to zend_language_scanner.c (just in case the two have to be maintained seperately). This should be easily back-portable to previous code trees. file: php-4.2.0\Zend\zend_language_scanner.l; replace: lines 941-942; - - - - - START - - - - - <INITIAL>"<%="|"<?="|"<?php=" { if ((yytext[1]=='%' && CG(asp_tags)) || (yytext[1]=='?' && CG(short_tags)) || (yytext[1]=='?' && yytext[2]=='p' && yytext[3]=='h' && yytext[4]=='p')) { - - - - - STOP - - - - - file: php-4.2.0\Zend\zend_language_scanner.c; replace: line 4086; - - - - - START - - - - - if ((yytext[1]=='%' && CG(asp_tags)) || (yytext[1]=='?' && CG(short_tags)) || (yytext[1]=='?' && yytext[2]=='p' && yytext[3]=='h' && yytext[4]=='p')) { - - - - - STOP - - - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=16763&edit=1