Re: cvs: php4 /ext/msession .cvsignore CREDITS README config.m4 msession-test.php msession.c msession.php php_msession.h reqclient.h
| From: | mlwmohawk at mohawksoft dot com | Date: | Fri, 24 May 2002 20:04:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: php4 /ext/msession .cvsignore CREDITS README config.m4 msession-test.php msession.c msession.php php_msession.h reqclient.h | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.cvs php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-12091@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> I don't mean to be blunt here, but consider the following:
>
> - working on the existing session stuff would probably have scored
> higher
I "tried" to work with the session stuff, and lets use the word inflexable to describe the
developers.
Msession is actually a standard session save handler in addition to the various extensions. So I
*did* work
on the existing session stuff. Originally I wanted msession.c to be in ext/session, but was told it
should
be ints own extension.
> - working more actively with everyone, rather than just on your
> own would
> be have more favourable
I worked "actively" with people, in fact, I have made a couple contributions to the
source. I have accepted
sugestions from users and other develpers about the extension.
> - not getting really angry when someone else touches your extension
> helps
All I asked is that "backward" compatibility be maintained, this does not seem like a
hideous request. What
would the maintainer of "ext/session" say if his variables were renamed and all the
functions rewritten,
mind you not "improved," no, just rewritten and no longer backward compatible?