Re: cvs: php4 /ext/domxml php_domxml.c

Hi This commit was reverted some minutes after the commit. It was a non intentional commit and there is no function called domxml_doc_free right now in the source tree. But anyway, this "free" was only used as a method within the DomDocument class. There was never a function called just free, but a method called $domdocument->free(). Will this be the wrong way to do it, the next time i'd like to commit it? chregu On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote: > Same here. Guys, if certain functions are new then why add non-coding > standard conforming names? I think having a function called "free" is > really sucky. We should only keep old function names if we feel it'll break > too many old scripts. As free is a new function it won't. > > Andi > > At 07:25 AM 8/27/2002 +0000, Christian Stocker wrote: > >+ PHP_FALIAS(free, domxml_doc_free, > > NULL) > -- nam...christian stocker adr...bremgartnerstr. 66, ch-8003 zurich pho...+41 1 451 6021 www...http://phant.ch/chregu mob...+41 76 561 8860 ema...chregu@phant.ch wor...+41 1 240 5670 gpg...0x5CE1DECB