Re: cvs: php4 / README.TESTING

Shouldn't we allow "-" in %i, too? I would like the following: %i = [+\-]?[0-9]+ %d = [0-9]+ %f = [+\-]?\.?[0-9]+\.?[0-9]* marcus At 15:08 23.10.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:

On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:

helly         Wed Oct 23 08:59:18 2002 EDT

Modified files:

    /php4     README.TESTING

Log: update and correct +/ext/standard/tests/strings 003.phpt is a good example for using EXPECTF +instead of EXPECT. From time to time the algorythmn used for shuffle +changed and sometimes the machine used to execute the code has influence +on the result of shuffle. But it always retuns a three character string +detectable by %s. Other forms scanable are %i for integers, %f for Maybe you want to add that %d is an alias for %i? regards, Derick -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Derick Rethans                                   http://derickrethans.nl/

JDI Media Solutions --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]-