Re: cvs: php4 /ext/mbstring config.m4

As far as i can see - there was only a question if anybody was against enabling it. And none really objected. Initiated the request: Yasuo No objection: Stig, Derick Liked the idea: Wez, Rui Hatmud and Dan mentioned some comparison to other comparable changes. Which had negative side effects and generally Dan is known to be against enabling any module by default. For me the concern was that it may be enabled by default if it is stable. As Derick wrote this seems the same as the result we now have. The only difference is that for some reason some people now think mbstring isn't stable. I guess that came from the start of the discussion where some talk of the conference was reported, something like "function overloading could harm php". But function overloading was disabled by default i thought. marcus At 12:06 13.11.2002, Derick Rethans wrote:

On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:

Then can you please also count the votes for enabling it in the first place when it was enabled by default in this[1] patch? I couldn't find any discussion on this. [1]

http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/mbstring/config.m4?login=2&r1=1.5&r2=1.6&ty=h Actually he did. Please see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=101805486809856&w=2 But I don't see any voting there, and I see the same concerns that are raised now. Derick -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Derick Rethans                                   http://derickrethans.nl/

JDI Media Solutions --------------[ if you hold a unix shell to your ear, do you hear the c? ]- -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php