Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/standard/tests/network ip_x86_64.phpt

From: Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:04:15 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: php-src(PHP_5_3) /ext/standard/tests/network ip_x86_64.phpt
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-46444@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Jani, right. Copying the tests is dangerous as people will forget to change all versions simply because they don't see them failing because they don't execute them. -> +1 on __EXPECT(F|REGEX)?(_(32|64))?__ marcus Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 1:53:44 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:44 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote: >> On 02.10.2007 15:29, Jani Taskinen wrote: >> > Oh..there was one for 64bit too..of course I missed that one since I >> > tested on 32bit only. Yet another reason to not separate tests.. ;) >> > (EXPECT64 :) >> >> Well, I think of suffixes more and more (test_name_64bit.phpt, test_name32bit.phpt). >> It becomes a real issue since the number of tests constantly increases and we have >> to parse & execute more and more SKIPIF sections. > Well, as the platform shouldn't matter and same code should be used, > just sometimes it gives different expected result, having separate 32/64 > bit expected result in same script would be more useful than having > multiple copies of tests.. > --Jani > -- > Patches/Donations: http://pecl.php.net/~jani/ Best regards, Marcus

« previous php.cvs (#46444) next »