Re: svn: /php/php-src/ branches/PHP_5_3/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt branches/PHP_5_4/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt trunk/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt
| From: | Kalle Sommer Nielsen | Date: | Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:08:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: svn: /php/php-src/ branches/PHP_5_3/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt branches/PHP_5_4/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt trunk/ext/sysvshm/tests/001.phpt | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-66300@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
2011/9/6 Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>:
> Can you post the diff?
> I don't see any reason why it should fail..
Windows for one does not implement a native ftok() function, and the
general use with ftok() was together with sysvshm(). If we have such
an implementation, it would make sense to enable sysvshm on Windows
too.
But back to subject, I agree that we should move both the function and
tests if there is no other valuable uses for ftok() outside of that
extension.
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
kalle@php.net