Re: com php-src: Add SO_REUSEPORT + SO_BROADCAST support via socket stream context option: NEWS UPGRADING ext/ftp/ftp.c main/network.c
main/php_network.h main/streams/xp_socket.c

From: Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:59:27 +0000
Subject: Re: com php-src: Add SO_REUSEPORT + SO_BROADCAST support via socket stream context option: NEWS UPGRADING ext/ftp/ftp.c main/network.c
main/php_network.h main/streams/xp_socket.c
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.cvs 
Request: Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-79752@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2014.08.06. 5:17, <rdlowrey@php.net> ezt írta: >>> > >>> > Commit: a51bf0cadf7862d10b2cc19cae2c991d24d670b1 >>> > Author: Daniel Lowrey <rdlowrey@php.net> Mon, 4 Aug 2014 >>> 12:41:51 -0400 >>> > Parents: 29eb0ea68605e81822e34d5a95443f2c176b2c73 >>> > Branches: PHP-5.6 >>> > >>> > Link: >>> >>> http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commitdiff;h=a51bf0cadf7862d10b2cc19cae2c991d24d670b1 >>> > >>> > Log: >>> > Add SO_REUSEPORT + SO_BROADCAST support via socket stream context >>> option >>> > >>> > Changed paths: >>> > M NEWS >>> > M UPGRADING >>> > M ext/ftp/ftp.c >>> > M main/network.c >>> > M main/php_network.h >>> > M main/streams/xp_socket.c >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >>> > To unsubscribe, visit: >>> > http://www.php.net/unsub.php >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> we are in feature freeze since beta1, and I don't see any recent >>> discussion on this so I would like to revert it from 5.6. >>> As far as I can tell this is a self contained feature addition so it is >>> possible to be introduced in a micro version, but I think that an rfc would >>> be warranted. >>> >> I'm not sure about the need of an RFC. >> >> This is just about adding options to our network stack, options which are >> welcome and make our network stack richer. >> I dont think there is need to discuss and debate, possibly infinitely, >> about such additions which are self contained and welcome. >> >> However, I'm OK to say we should revert from 5.6 branch that we are >> trying to make stable. >> This could be added to 5.6.1 though, as the inpact is tiny and the >> addition is self-contained with no impact elsewhere but in network. >> >> >> Julien.Pauli >> >> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess > "Bugfixes only (with a room for exceptions on a case by case basis and > only for small self contained features additions)." > I interpret the case-by-case basis as some third-party (eg. not the > author) has to approve. > Currently we use the rfc process for making decisions, but I guess the RMs > could also be the ones making such decisions. > Exactly. For self-contained features, which are not too big (that's the case here), we, as RMs, can make such decisions on behalf of the PHP project. We may use such a "right" here, or , if you want to feel more confident, you still may throw a mail to intern@ls saying you're gonna merge this if no-one points objections against it ;-) Julien.Pauli

« previous php.cvs (#79752) next »