Re: com php-src: Remove support for classes without class entries: Zend/zend_API.c Zend/zend_builtin_functions.c Zend/zend_closures.c
Zend/zend_execute.h Zend/zend_interfaces.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.h Zend/zend...
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:57:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: com php-src: Remove support for classes without class entries: Zend/zend_API.c Zend/zend_builtin_functions.c Zend/zend_closures.c Zend/zend_execute.h Zend/zend_interfaces.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.h Zend/zend... |
||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.cvs php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-cvs+get-82227@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Yeah, JavaBridge used it, but it doesn't means it need it.
zend_class_entry * _php_java_get_class_entry(zval *object TSRMLS_DC)
{
return java_class;
}
I agree, it would be better if we would discuss it on @internals, but it
would take much longer time
If you still see use cases for it, please show
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > we discussed this issue with Nikita on IRC, and didn't find any use
> > cases for objects without ce now.
> > Nor in php neither in pecl.
> > Do you see any problems?
>
> Those were used to create "bridge" APIs - like Zend's Java bridge (not
> sure if supported now, probably not, and if it's still uses that), as
> far as I remember. It may be that PECL does not use it but people have
> internal extensions that are not published. So deleting a chunk of the
> API without as much as a note on internals is not really a good idea, I
> think.
>
> IRC discussion is not a public discussion, since most of the people are
> not present on the IRC and have no idea about anything being discussed
> there.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
>