Re: Sybase array result problems-- help!!
| From: | Carroll Barrett | Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:13:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Sybase array result problems-- help!! | ||
| Groups: | php.db | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-db+get-1241@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pretlow,
I have always used ct-lib, with only one problem that wasn't my
own fault. There was a problem with sybase_pconnect() which
appeared with php4, but was fixed within 2-3 days of my
submitting a bug report. Kudos to the development team members
for their quick response!
Regards,
Carroll Barrett
-----Original Message-----
From: Pretlow L. Stevenson III <php@diamon-associates.com>
To: Carroll Barrett <cbarrett@inalt.com>
Date: Monday, July 17, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: [PHP-DB] Sybase array result problems-- help!!
>Hi Carrol,
>
>Good question. So let me try to explain without showing too much
of my own
>ignorance. ;-)
>
>To be honest, I'm not sure that a clear decision was made to go
either way.
>PHP is something that we've just now started to explore for our
current
>project. So part of our recent development scripts have served
the purpose
>of fulfilling our app requirements, while also serving to
determine which
>aspects of our system config are stable and which are not. I
believe that
>db-lib is the default unless you choose the ct-lib; or am I
wrong here? But
>to answer your question, I believe the server setup was geared
more toward a
>generic than optimized config.
>
>But as you stated, and after doing research, it seems that
ct-lib does offer
>a clear advantage over db-lib. So this is definitely the route
we are going
>to take. Also, I read that db-lib support is being phased out of
Sybase, so
>as you stated it doesn't really make sense to use the older lib,
lose out on
>the additional features ct-lib can offer, and have the hassle of
writing
>less than optimized scripts working around db-lib's
shortcomings. I'm
>assuming you've always been running ct-lib? I'm thinking this
might explain
>why you haven't had the refresh problems. Or have you also run
db-lib with
>success on PHP 4.x? I haven't seen any of the refresh problems
reported
>using ct-lib. Actually, I read a few postings that said to use
ct-lib as a
>workaround if you experience the db-lib problems.
>
>
>Pretlow Stevenson
>Computer Associates International
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carroll Barrett [mailto:cbarrett@inalt.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 5:05 PM
>To: Pretlow L. Stevenson III; php-db@lists.php.net
>Cc: php-dev@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DB] Sybase array result problems-- help!!
>
>
>Pretlow,
>
>To expose some of my ignorance...
>
>Why do you use db-lib instead of ct-lib? When I began
developing
>the application I am currently working on, I chose to use Sybase
>becase my client insisted on either Sybase or Oracle. I was not
>familiar with either; but at that time Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 was
>the only completely free verson of either that I knew of, so
>that's what I picked. I chose to use php's ct-lib support
>because it was a newer package and it supported some functions
>that db-lib did not.
>
>By the way, I have *not* experienced the refresh problems you
>have.
>
>Regards,
>Carroll Barrett
>