Re: MySQL, PHP or ghost?

Peter, et al -- ..and then Peter Beckman said... % % On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, David T-G wrote: % % > Looks like it, though I admit that the manual doesn't adequately explain % > your results. Check out section 6.2.2.4 for details. % % I did; see my previous (moments ago) email on my read on that manual % section. Ah; I will when it comes through :-) % % > % So my assumption is that if I insert with year="" it should use the % > % default. Or at least 0000. % > % > That makes sense. And so what is the default? Looks like it is, for % > some reason, 2000. [This isn't a TIMESTAMP field, so we don't % > necessarily expect it to be "this year".] % % The default at the time was 0000. At the time of the mysql release, you might mean? Certainly at the time of the manual writing... % .. % > Looks like it's standard mysql behavior: % % But that's what I'm questioning. Should it be that way? If so, the % manual page for YEAR should be altered. If it shouldn't work that way, it % should be submitted as a bug. Makes sense. Having removed all php elements, you'd probably get a better answer on the mysql list. HTH & HAND & Good luck! :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) davidtg@justpickone.org * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) davidtgwork@justpickone.org -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!