Re: general theory behind 'primary_key' & 'auto_increment' flags, and ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ?
| From: | Govinda | Date: | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:40:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: general theory behind 'primary_key' & 'auto_increment' flags, and ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.db |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-db+get-46314@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jul 15, 2009, at 7:37 AM, Bastien Koert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Govinda<govinda.webdnatalk@gmail.com> wrote:well isn't it that in order for the REPLACE INTO to replace the old row I have to try and replace a row with an already existing uniqueID? The same thing I would do to cause the INSERT.. SET .. ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE to kick in? Don't both methods equally effectively 'prevent duplicate primary keys from occurring'? -GReading docs.. I want to be sure of things... have your verification of my understanding(s)- Does setting a mysql db column (say "myPrimarykeyID") with the 'primary_key' & 'auto_increment' flags totally negate the logic for ever having to use ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in an INSERT? Or is it that I can do an INSERT with SET myPrimarykeyID=someAlreadyExistingVal, a=1, b=2.... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE a=edited1, b=edited2 ... I am trying to learn/work out the mysql/php code that will allow me to either create *or* edit a record, in one fell swoop. Thanks for any insight! -Govinda -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpIf that is the goal use the REPLACE INTO sql syntax You really don't want to allow duplicates in primary keys, that completely negates the usefulness of that key