RE: [PHP-DB] CSS versus Includes

When I asked the question, what I meant was should I use the includes to hold page style details or a CSS file. And someone who understood that this was not an apples and oranges situation but one of approach answered that Netscape was not fully supportive of CSS and suggested includes may be the way to go. -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Dunford [mailto:a47xxy@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 6:58 PM To: php-db@lists.php.net Subject: RE: [PHP-DB] CSS versus Includes On 31 Mar 2001 13:19:45 -0800 AD in php.db, Michael Geier said: >this post is about apples and oranges... > >CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) have nothing to do with includes. >They only have to do with formatting elements on a web page. >They can be written inside the document, or can referenced >externally via a <LINK> tag. > >Includes can be anything from a configuration file, a block of >text, or a header or footer statement that works across multiple >pages, so you don't have to duplicate code. Including a CSS :) -- ======================================================================= Patrick Dunford, Christchurch, NZ - http://pdunford.godzone.net.nz/ Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen. -- Ephesians 3:20-21 http://www.heartlight.org/cgi-shl/todaysverse.cgi?day=20010331 ======================================================================= Created by Mail2Sig - http://pdunford.godzone.net.nz/software/mail2sig/ -- PHP Database Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-db-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-db-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net