ODBC w/num_rows()/affected_rows()

Is there any reason not to make an odbc_affected_rows() alias to odbc_num_rows(), since that is where some will expect to find this functionality? And, if so, am I correct in thinking that this would require adding the following line to unified_odbc.c: UODBC_FE_ALIAS(affected_rows, num_rows, NULL), ...and... UODBC_ALIAS_FE(affected_rows, num_rows, NULL), I'd just go ahead and try it, but I don't have access to anything to test with for the next couple of days... Thanks, Torben