Re: classifying bugs?

That would be excellent. --Joey Smith Please forgive the long sig: *** Notice To Bulk Emailers: Attention! Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, 227, any & all unsolicited commercial e-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and archival fee in the amount of the $1500 US and copies will be forwarded to domain administrators. Emailing denotes acceptance of said terms! On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Sascha Schumann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 01:00:18PM -0700, Joey wrote: > > I am going to try and go through and close all bugs older than 3.0.10, or > > so...I will probably just ask the reporter to verify that the bug is still > > there. Does anyone have an objection? > > > > Should I close them, or mark them as something else? I was thinking of > > perhaps marking them all as "Suspended" or "Analyzed" until more info > > comes in...preferences, anyone? > > What about adding a "feedback" status which would be used for > reports where we are awaiting user feedback. Then we could > automatically suspend these after time X. > > -- > > Regards, > > Sascha Schumann > Consultant >