Re: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard var.c /ext/wddx wddx.c
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:38:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: php4 /ext/standard var.c /ext/wddx wddx.c | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-21936@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 20:52 21/06/2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Zeev Suraski wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:No argument about that, I was just pointing out that I didn't think he was doing that with bad intentions. I'm not trying to argue it was the right thing to do... Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/SS>> Modified files:would beSS>> /php4/ext/wddx wddx.c SS>> /php4/ext/standard var.cSS>> Log: SS>> Revert earlier commit. People, I don't know what are accepted guidelines in PHP Group, but is it good that somebody is committing patch to controversial thing while it is in discussion, thus trying to force "facts on ground"? I think itmore productive to reach some agreement and then start botheringCVS... Oram I mistaken in it?Well, I don't think Thies was trying to force his opinion, but more like using CVS to safe-guard his uncommitted code. I think I'm also against doing that while people are still arguing about that piece of code, but I'm sure Thies had no malice.I don't think his intentions were bad, but I still would have appreciated it, if he had backed out his controversial changes himself, rather than forcing other people to do it.