This behaviour, being rather unusual, should be then documented.
I totally disagree. This *is* a bug and should be eliminated. To accept a buggy behaviour no one uses (why should someone use this, it really makes no sense) just to preserve 101% backward compatibilty isn´t fine.
The impact will be absolutely minimal chaning this behaviour.
This should be changed I don´t see any problems with that.
Rasmus, please tell me why it is a problem.
regards
--
o----------0-¬---------O-·---¬----o---®-----o o O ° .
| http://www.kiffen.de | pRoteçt y0ur bRaín |0 O ° ¤ °
·
0°·³°²'²³-¹'³´³°^°³~³²³°'³²²¨³²^³¹³²°²³`³º³°Þ °
o © ° . ·
| psychedelic experience | gott@kiffen.de | O ° o °
o-¬--o--0-----©-·--O-----o-----0-¤----------o 0 ° · ° . ¤ ·