Re: My final say on Empress RBDMS and PHP

From: Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 23:34:01 +0000
Subject: Re: My final say on Empress RBDMS and PHP
References: 1 2  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-2790@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Andreas Karajannis wrote: > Steve Williams wrote: > > > I THINK that the data should NEVER be displayed in a HTML table, > > therefore the code should be: > > > > case SQL_LONGVARBINARY: > > php3_printf("<td>Not printable</td>"); > > break; > > > > You are right, but the whole binary handling has to take into account, > that > there are many users that use Access with uodbc. Unfortunately, the > popular > Access "Memo" fields are of type LONGVARBINARY - but mostly contain just > text. In earlier versions of uodbc, binary columns never got displayed > in tables and got passed through to the client by odbc_result(). To > resolve this, odbc_binmode and odbc_longreadlen were introduced to allow > Access users to display their data. This handling may be a little bit > confusing, but allows for maximum flexibility. > > -Andreas > OK, that seems reasonable. But does this mean that an application writer should set binmode before using the odbc_result_all function, or should I do something specific for Empress (something I hope to avoid - the fewer #ifdef VENDOR lines the better...). I suppose the point is fairly unimportant because (I expect) most app developers would not leave binary objects in their SELECT statements for HTML pages :-? Steve -- PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/ To unsubscribe send an empty message to php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For help: php-dev-help@lists.php.net

« previous php.dev (#2790) next »