Re: Re: note 8396 added to get_html_translation_table

André Langhorst <A.Langhorst@itbnet.de> wrote: > not really, users can rely on this beeing working by default, if not > it´s a bug and gets fixed (as in 4.0.3 if it was wrong in 4.0.2 > following your msg), so you shouldn´t encourage them not to use them as > intended I'm not encouraging anything. I was just pointing out that people should be careful. In an ideal world, the code would be changed, but I expect the developers have better things to do. > > No, it isn't. Look at the code. For both htmlspecialchars, and htmlentities, > > the same function is used. This function uses the translation table only > > for characters 160 and above, and has some other hard-coded translations > > which are used regardless of what the table says. > > sure, where´s the problem? htmlentities implies htmlspecialchars... You said that my comment was wrong for the case of htmlentities. It was not.