Re: Re: cvs: php4 / TODO

Jim Jagielski wrote: > Here are my own personal comments, directed to no one in general > and certainly in response to nothing in general :) :) :) > But I tend to believe that there are more in Java. And you may be right here, I don't know. > The fact that a saw can cut, but a hammer can't, doesn't make the > hammer a worthless tool ;) Correct. > Not to say that PHP shouldn't continue to grow and evolve. There should > be an abstraction that PHP isn't so server-resident. Better Java > interoperability is good. Taking some clues from the transaction > nature of Java application servers is wise as well. That was what I wanted to pint out. > But saying PHP != Java and therefore for PHP to succeed, it must become > more Java-like... I haven't said _that_. > So Yes to growing PHP! But No to making it > Java: "... And he that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left > the path of wisdom" :) :) "Blessed is he that codeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therin: for the time of PHP is at hand." "PHP is here and Zend will follow, for ASP there's no tomorrow." Keep the faith, Sebastian -- <?php $a=explode(" " ,"119 130 128 129 45 110 123 124 129 117 114 127 45 ". "125 117 125 45 117 110 112 120 114 127");for($i=0;$i<sizeof($a);$i++)print chr($a[$i]-13); // http://sb.phpOpenTracker.de | mail: sbergmann@php.net ?>