Re: zend_hash_add_or_update flaw
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Wed, 06 Dec 2000 20:58:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: zend_hash_add_or_update flaw | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-40254@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 09:50 PM 12/6/00 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Right. It doesn't work with unaligned data but did you actually bump into such a case in PHP? I prefer not moving to memcpy() unless this is actually the case.OK, I didn't realize you are actually being bitten by this. Go ahead and commit your patch. Andi --- Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/Yes (please refer to my first message). We are basically strtok'ing through a string and adding parts of that string to the hash.memcpy is often implemented as an inline function or even assembler by the C library, so the speed impact should be negligible.