Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #6248 Updated: parent:: is undocumented
| From: | Ron Chmara | Date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:26:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP 4.0 Bug #6248 Updated: parent:: is undocumented | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-41845@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I think that having them in the bug system helps add a level of priority
to undocumented features/functions. Something which is undocumented,
and rarely used, is no big deal. But if it's used often enough that
we're getting bug reports on it, I'd say that it *increases* the level
of importance for documenting a given feature/function, or correcting a
documentation error.
Closing a documentation bug can be done like any other bug, patch the CVS
(in this case, the CVS for phpdoc/), and then close it... currently, we only
have 32 or so reports in there, (http://bugs.php.net/bugstats.php), so it's
not like we need a whole additional system for this, or that it's adding
a lot of weight, is it?
stas@php.net wrote:
> ID: 6248
> Why not keeps them into bug system until somebody fixes it?
>
> Previous Comments:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [2000-11-17 11:04:52] jmoore@php.net
> There seem to be quite a few bugs about undocumented features such as this one. Should we leave
> them open or should we close them as there are lots and lots of undocmented "features".
> Personally I think we should close them.. I know zend.com has all the un
> documented functions, maybe we could get a list of features that need docmentation but I would
> not say there were bugs as such.
>
> What do you guys think?
--
Personal: ron@opus1.com, 520-326-6109, http://www.opus1.com/ron/
Work: rchmara@pnsinc.com, 520-546-8993, http://www.pnsinc.com/
The opinions expressed in this email are not neccesarrily those of myself,
my employers, or any of the other little voices in my head.