Re: Time for 4.0.5?

since sending this email i have been thinking a lot about it. bzip2 is fine for many sys admins but we have the problem of the redhat users (dont take this the wrong way please) that have used no other distributions and have only ever installed an rpm before, for these users bzip2 would get confusing. im more inclined to have multiple distribution's, a standard user one which would be base+mysql+mcrypt+zlib and not much more, an oracle one etc. the only problem is working out what modules people are mostly using. *grin* any other suggestions? Emiliano wrote: > Cameron wrote: > > > > i'll agree its about due for release, can we do SOMETHING about the download > > size tho? i dont really have any ideas on decent ways to shrink it but it > > seems to be bloating to me. could do with the mcrypt fix's and zeev's output > > buffer fix 1st tho . . . > > Hum, having just contributed to said download size... we've done our > best to > minimize the KLOC, removing some cruft and moving a couple of functions > into > a (separate) library, but we'd be down to stripping comments to go > further... > the only other thing I could suggest is using bzip2 instead of gzip: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 emile emile 1952068 Feb 19 10:53 > php-4.0.4pl1.tar.bz > -rw-r--r-- 1 emile emile 2439189 Feb 19 10:52 > php-4.0.4pl1.tar.gz > > which is a 20% size reduction without changing anything else. > > Emile > > -- > PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net