Re: feature request

> Generally using functions for two different purposes is a bad idea, but > enhancing functions with additional arguments that extend its functionality > is not too bad. In this case, adding n arguments is perhaps the extension > that makes the most sense for isset(), so we should go with it. Keeping it > with one argument 'for future use' doesn't make much sense in my > opinion. Not any more sense than saying the same thing about some new > argument someone might want to add to it in the future - why not keep it > clean and wait for a 'better' use? > > Zeev I agree, this is something thats had more thought put into it than it really needed. This functionality very much fits issets nature - something goes in and 0/1 comes out. There really is no reason to not implement the request. -Jason