Re: Re: PEAR (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard config.m4)

From: Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:04:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PEAR (was: Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php4 /ext/midgard config.m4)
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-49430@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >Because the whole point of this was to make life easier on midgard users. > > So you're saying that every widely used external (at the moment) > php-extension should be put into PHP CVS? :) If it will help users and there is demand for it, sure. Like the imlib2 extension for example. That probably should be in PHP CVS. > Isn't php-gtk done like the way the PEAR (C) components should be done? > At least that's how I compiled that extension. Separately from PHP. > Using phpize. So I would guess having e.g. midgard outside PHP shouldn't > matter at all? No, we need tighter integration. We want to be able to do something along the lines of "pear pear.php.net/midgard" and it would go and fetch the the component, build it and install it. -Rasmus

« previous php.dev (#49430) next »