Re: Re: cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt

From: Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:00:42 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php4 / TODO-4.1.txt
References: 1  Groups: php.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-dev+get-51626@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote: > We need to do some thinking about this 4.1 business, before we actually do > anything. Please don't branch anything at this point - we've had a fairly > bad experience with premature branching with PHP 3.1. > don't worry, I wasn't planning on creating the branch :) > We need to get a clear understanding of what's going to be the main changes > in PHP 4.1, and then shift 99% of the development to it. We've been > discussing this in the group@ forum, and should now move the discussion > here. Generally, the main differences we came up with so far are (as per > Stig): > - Move most of the non-popular extensions out of the release and into PEAR > (requires lots of PEAR work to be made) definetly :) deciding which extensions are non-popular should be, uhhhhhhhhh, fun. :))) > - Always build the CGI > - No language-level (i.e. Zend Engine) changes scheduled for this release > at this time > > In my opinion, we shouldn't do anything on the repository level until the > new PEAR services are in place. If we do, we're going to shoot ourselves > in the foot - we won't be able to release 4.1, and we won't really have an > updated CVS to release 4.0.x from. It's probably premature to branch at > this time. > I'd agree with that. I think 4.1 is also when we were planning on implementing the naming conventions for the functions (breaking compat). > In my opinion #2, the changes you mentioned aren't necessarily something > that belongs in 4.1 - they can easily find themselves in 4.0 (you can add > the new XSLT stuff under a different extension, for instance). That's just > my opinion though - you can wait :) > definetly. just saying when the 4.1 branch would be usable for me. ;) -Sterling

« previous php.dev (#51626) next »