Re: R: [PHP-DEV] request
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:57:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: R: [PHP-DEV] request | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-51801@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Everyone - please read about this already hashed-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt topic in the mailing list archive.
PHP 4.0 is not going to have destructors, ever. Its design simply doesn't allow for it.
Zeev
At 17:34 17/4/2001, Alberto wrote:
Yes, destructor ... it's a good thing to have... David Guerizec <david@guerizec.net> wrote in message 20010417135832.5498.qmail@hal.dottux.net... "Peter \"[DiSAStA]\" Petermann" <webmaster@cyberfly.net> wrote:-- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> CTO & co-founder, Zend Technologies Ltd. http://www.zend.com/Hi stas,it" :-)JT>> > Ah, that's another way to say "When Andi and Zeev implementhardJT>> JT>> Like..never? :) Generally, since PHP is not a strongly typed language, it's not tootheto implement multiple inheritance, I guess. Question is - is it worthIMHO, a more usful thing to see before multiple inheritance would be proper constructor (and eventually destructor) callings...effort? Does it need to be done?mh.. would be real great for some things... well, the typical PHP-Coder doesnt need it, but, in some cases it could be usefull...Peter Petermann -- /* ZIMT - where PHP meets needs* * peter@phpug.de - www.phpug.de * webmaster@cyberfly.net - www.cyberfly.net */-- Best regards, David Guerizec -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-dev-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-dev-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net